×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more
You are welcome to look at the talkback but please consider that this article is over 16 years old before posting.

Forum - View topic
NEWS: Manga Nominated for "Great Graphic Novels for Teens"


Goto page 1, 2  Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Hon'ya-chan



Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Posts: 973
PostPosted: Tue Aug 21, 2007 5:52 am Reply with quote
Man, what the hell were these guys smoking when they picked these? Dramacon would be a good pick for young people, but not the other OEL crap.

Make 5 Wishes.....complete waste of time, and I can't understand what the underlying message is. Imaginary friends are good?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
marie-antoinette



Joined: 18 Sep 2005
Posts: 4136
Location: Ottawa, Canada
PostPosted: Tue Aug 21, 2007 6:40 am Reply with quote
I have to admit, I keep wanting to check 5 Wishes out. The story sounds intriguing and the art is gorgeous. I also think that if this was something from Japan with a JPop star instead of Avril, everyone would think it was cool.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime My Manga
Mohawk52



Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 8202
Location: England, UK
PostPosted: Tue Aug 21, 2007 7:25 am Reply with quote
Glad to see Romeo and Juliet made the list, but sad that Hamlet did not. Oh well maybe later.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CatzCradle



Joined: 25 Apr 2007
Posts: 230
Location: Canada
PostPosted: Tue Aug 21, 2007 3:12 pm Reply with quote
I'm so happy to see After School Nightmare made the the list! Can't wait for the next volume to come out...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
KAtchan15



Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 460
Location: NYC
PostPosted: Tue Aug 21, 2007 3:47 pm Reply with quote
To be honest, manwha's have been giving me a lot of trouble lately. Specially Ice kunion's "Forest of gray city". I still don't have volume 2 [Tried ordering it but B&N can't get it somehow] Plus "100% perfect girl" [net comics] vol. 3, it makes me really mad when I can't get the things I want. Ice kunion doesn't have a site either.

I'm really happy that death note's tops them all. It's the best manga I've read so far.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mr.Shonen



Joined: 13 Aug 2006
Posts: 269
Location: Brooklyn, NY
PostPosted: Tue Aug 21, 2007 5:39 pm Reply with quote
Death Note is a no-brainer, but Kekkaishi, that's what I'm talking about. YOu people should go pick it up. It's a good series. Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
mhermance



Joined: 23 Mar 2005
Posts: 7
PostPosted: Tue Aug 21, 2007 6:03 pm Reply with quote
"Man, what the hell were these guys smoking when they picked these?"

Remember, these nominations were not made by otaku, but librarians. Not that, ahem, somebody can't be both.
But in this case the criteria were not limited to manga and manhwa, and for a very specific, age defined reading group. So the nominations had to be for, say, 13-19 year olds, and although the titles *could* be from anywhere in the publishing world, most would be from the big North American publisherss, with a strong showing from Japan and some from Korea.
Since the judges deal with this stuff for a living (a good way to kill a hobby, by the way), they had to wade through a *lot* of nominations, as well as their regular work. I'm glad it turned out as well as it did.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
quartears



Joined: 27 May 2007
Posts: 46
PostPosted: Tue Aug 21, 2007 6:34 pm Reply with quote
I just call manga j-comics to truly distinguish it from regular American graphic novels and Korean manhwa.

That's sad that no one's going crazy for Monster. Then again I guess Monster's not really for teens...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SharinganEye



Joined: 01 Feb 2005
Posts: 402
Location: Les Etats-Unis d'Amérique
PostPosted: Tue Aug 21, 2007 10:03 pm Reply with quote
quartears wrote:
I just call manga j-comics to truly distinguish it from regular American graphic novels and Korean manhwa.
I don't understand this logic.

Quote:
That's sad that no one's going crazy for Monster. Then again I guess Monster's not really for teens...
My local library system only has volumes 4 through 6 of Monster. Which I don't understand and is a pity.

Especially given crap titles nominated like "Princess Resurrection."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shirokiryuu



Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 714
Location: Northern California (SF Bay Area)
PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 1:10 am Reply with quote
Wow. Cool Mushi-shi? I hope this means I will be able to find it at my library soon.

Although i love this manga, I doesn't seem as much as a stereotypical "teen" title, but I'm glad for all the attention it's getting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Snowcleo



Joined: 23 Aug 2007
Posts: 3
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 2:40 pm Reply with quote
As one of the librarians who was on the 2007 Great Graphic Novels for Teens committee, I want to thank Anime News Network for getting the word out about the list and the work that YALSA is doing to promote graphic novels. It was a fun committee to work on with a great group of dedicated professionals who ranged from longtime otaku and fanboys/girls to graphic novels newbies. Everyone took the responsibility of crafting such a list very seriously and tried to find the best titles from the widest range of publishers, artists, writers, genres, countries, etc. mhermance is correct in that we did have an age range we were working in, though that range is 12-18, instead of 13-19. (Thank you, mhermance, for your kind words of support for our work.)

One mistake I would like to correct is that there was only one manga title on the 2007 list. Actually, there were 10 manga, OEL manga, and manhwa titles on the final list and that doesn't count the ones that were nominated, but ultimately didn't make the list. Here are the manga titles which were on the 2007 list:
Svetlana Chmakova Dramacon, vol. 1 (TokyoPop)
Amy Kim Ganter Sorcerers & Secretaries, vol. 1 (TokyoPop)
Jason Henderson & Tony Salvaggio Psy-Comm, vol. 1 (TokyoPop)
Tsugumi Ohba & Takeshi Ohbata Death Note, vols. 1-3 (VIZ)
Jen Lee Quick Off*Beat, vol. 1 (TokyoPop)
Ji-Sang Shin & Geo Chocolat, vol. 1-3 (ICE Kunion)
Naoki Urasawa Naoki Urasawa's Monster, vol. 1 (VIZ)
Ai Yazawa Nana, vol. 1-2 (VIZ)
Fumi Yoshinaga Antique Bakery, vol. 2-4 (DMP)
Higuri You Cantarella, vol. 1 (Go Comi)

If you have any manga, manhwa, OEL manga, or other graphic novels which you love, you are welcome to nominate them for the 2008 Great Graphic Novels for Teens list. They must have been published between Sept. 1, 2006 and Dec. 31, 2007.

And, to answer the question about ICE Kunion titles--their titles are being picked up by the new Yen Press and will be being reprinted as the current print runs sell out. The continuing volumes will also be published by Yen Press, so you will still be able to get the ICE Kunion titles you know and love.

Hope this helps answer any question you might have!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Snowcleo



Joined: 23 Aug 2007
Posts: 3
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 2:45 pm Reply with quote
Okay, so rereading the article I see that it is correct that Death Note was the only title on the Top Ten. Sorry about the confusion! The problem with being a avid reader is that sometimes I don't read as carefully as I should! Sorry about that! Embarassed
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Xenos



Joined: 29 Mar 2004
Posts: 1519
Location: Boston
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 4:28 pm Reply with quote
I don't mind American or non-Japanese books being mentioned. I do mind that only SOME of them were mentioned.

Sure you mention Avalon High Coronation Volume 1, Dramacon Volume 2, and My Dead Girlfriend Volume 1and the German title Gothic Sports.

Why not mention Re-Gifters by Mike Carey, Sonny Liew, Marc Hempel? It's about a young Asian American teen. She's Korean and you cover Korean manhwa. Why not cover an American book about Korean Americans? That bugs the crap out of me.

Really, do you only cover American books that have the bullcrap label 'manga' on them? Why does everything TokyoPop have get covered by the same books by the same authors at other companies get ignored?

Hey, why not cover Paul Pope's Batman Year 100? Pope is an actual American mangaka. He went over to Japan and published under a Japanese publisher for some years.

I'm not trying to attack ANN and its coverage, but I really don't get these inconsistencies and the invisible lines that get drawn by companies, fans, and news outlets. It's really frustrating when I see this done.

You even mention that terrible sounding Romeo and Juliet in the generic bullcrap 'manga style'. Ugh. That 'Manga Shakespeare' is being done by some American authors is just dumbfounding (or in this case Bristish authors publishing in America). Hell, I know plenty of good British comic book authors. Though they tend to do more mature audience books.

I shouldn't have to even get into 'Avril Lavigne's Make Five Wishes' being labeled manga. I'll just add that it's funny that I bought a comic the same month by who I later found was the same artist. One publisher (SLG) calls their work a comic, another (DelRay) calls it manga. So.. is it money that determines the definition of a word since one is a huge publishing house and the other is a small indie publisher?

The abuse of the word continues. That any American publisher can produce their own manga is bullcrap. They can only reprint manga from Japan, not make their own. Anything else is a gimmick that cheapens the word.

That ANN accepts this and even helps it instead of calling it out annoys me. Why ignore the issue of American books using a Japanese term. Let's investigate it. Let's look at it. Let's just not let it slip under the radar and accept it.

I have friends into animation and comics as their field. It's not my field, but I hope to help them and work on it myself as a hobby and passion writing comics. So it affects me personally when I see that a comic has to falsely label itself 'manga' to get noticed by brainwashed fans. I'm not just trolling. This issue directly affects me and my friends. It's a major concern for me.

SharinganEye wrote:
quartears wrote:
I just call manga j-comics to truly distinguish it from regular American graphic novels and Korean manhwa.
I don't understand this logic.

Quote:
That's sad that no one's going crazy for Monster. Then again I guess Monster's not really for teens...
My local library system only has volumes 4 through 6 of Monster. Which I don't understand and is a pity.

Especially given crap titles nominated like "Princess Resurrection."


Calling manga 'J-comics' makes more sense than calling American books 'manga'. Why call an American product by a Japanese name in English? THAT makes no sense. You know, unless it's a gimmick trying to trick people.

To be fair, Monster is more of a mature readers title, not teens. Though I think they should be able to if they're a bit older, just put a warning for older teens. It's an amazing book.

shirokiryuu wrote:
Wow. Cool Mushi-shi? I hope this means I will be able to find it at my library soon.

Although i love this manga, I doesn't seem as much as a stereotypical "teen" title, but I'm glad for all the attention it's getting.


It's not so much they're looking for teen titles. It's more so a good title for teens. I think it's a wonderful title for them, nevermind wonderful in general.

One final note. I just saw you can see which titles were nominated, but rejected. I find it interesting that Scott McCloud's Making Comics, a tome teaching about the history of comics and manga and how one can make their own comics, was left out. No wonder so many teens don't know what manga and comics are. Though to be honest, I've only read his first book Understanding Comics. This is basically an updated version with a bit more focus on creating comics. I keep meaning to buy it or borrow it from a friend.

I highly recommend either book to anyone looking into making their own comics or interested in their history and scholarly value.


Last edited by The Xenos on Thu Aug 23, 2007 4:59 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
britannicamoore



Joined: 05 Dec 2005
Posts: 2618
Location: Out.
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 4:56 pm Reply with quote
The Xenos- I think thats the first time i've agreed with everything you said 100%.
I've always wondered why they call it OEL manga. Sure its manga style but its not the real thing regardless.

And I read five wishes. It was complete garbage.
That list...was. I think they could have picked some better titles. I wonder if they sent the manga to the libraies or they had to read off of what they already had.

if thats the case...it might explain why some titles were so poor.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
The Xenos



Joined: 29 Mar 2004
Posts: 1519
Location: Boston
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 6:00 pm Reply with quote
Thanks for the agreement, but I have to disagree with you. (Aren't I a stinker? Can't even take a compliment! Twisted Evil ) I'd go even further than you did and say these books aren't even in a 'manga style'.

I'd say there is no manga style, just a stereotype of what manga, or Japanese comics, should look like. Manga has a variety of art styles and to say there is only one style to manga is a disservice. It's pretty much as bad as saying all Asian people look alike! And that's terrible.

I have shelves full of manga. Yotsuba&! is a different style from Blame! is a different style from One Piece is a different style from Lone Wolf and Cub. I'd turn around to list off more, but right now I have a cat asleep in my lap.

Also, someone mentioned Death Note. The reason Death Note isn't listed looks to be that Viz didn't nominate it.

http://www.ala.org/ala/yalsa/booklistsawards/greatgraphicnovelsforteens/nominations.htm

Though I want to say it got mentioned last year. Maybe that is why it's not on this year.

Actually, edit, Death Note was listed in the Top Ten Graphic Novel List of 2007.

http://www.ala.org/ala/yalsa/booklistsawards/greatgraphicnovelsforteens/07topten.htm

So I guess that's even better than being on this new longer list. Woot!

Tokyopop artist of pirate tale East Caost Rising Becky Cloonan and Brian Wood's Demo also is on this list.

Sadly, that udder piece of garbage Identity Crisis is also on the list. This one really split DC fans. Some fans like it. Others hate it. I'm in the latter. That they took a lighthearted character killed her, burned her body, and rapred retroactively in a flashback disgusts me to no end. Even more disgusting is that the rape was never talked about ever again nor were the issues of her rape ever delt with in any following comic. Never mind this story behind the scenes in editorial of how it happened. (Part 1. Part 2.) I like to ignore DC ever published such a piece of garbage.

Oh and Warren Ellis's NextWave: Agents of H.A.T.E. being on the top ten list is also epic win. Go read it or Fing Fang Foom will put you in his giant monster pants.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group